Proposal for Destroying
Angel (16mm/B&W & Color/30 minutes)
by Philip Hoffman in collaboration with Wayne
Salazar
Aug. 1995
BACKGROUND
In 1994 I collaborated with
Finnish filmmaker Sami van Ingen
to produce Sweep (1995/32min). The film chronicles a journey to
James Bay, in search of the place that Sami's
great-grandfather, Robert Flaherty, had been and to Kapuskasing,
where my mother's family first settled when they arrived in
In Sweep, rather than
approaching these concerns alone as I had in the past, I chose to work
collaboratively with an artist who was grappling with similar issues. The
intersection of public and private histories was starkly visible through the
figure of Sami's great-grandfather. Robert Flaherty had
made a significant contribution to the public history of ethnographic
filmmaking and had left a remarkable family legacy of the great 'genius' artist
by embodying this myth and by repeated intergenerational stories of his valour.
Our reflections were informed
by a shared commitment to view the Western European colonization of Indigenous
people and their cultures in light of our respective histories. We started by
attempting to dismantle the division between public and private history vis a vis
Sami's great-grandfather. Formally, the film
manipulates the conventions of the decidedly male 'Road Movie' genre which informed
my earlier film The Road Ended At the Beach (1983/33
min). As expected, we immediately confronted the dilemma of how to shoot in an
others' culture, a dilemma which is the focus of my earlier film Somewhere
Between Jalostotitlan
and Encarnacion (1984/6 min). The
collaborative nature of this project created new possibilities for
reformulating old questions about representation. Keeping in mind Flaherty's
dubious legacy of filming the 'other', how were we to shoot, what were we to
film? These crucial questions changed through the process of collaboration from
"How do we film in this Native culture?" to "What does the way
we shoot tell us about the privilege we are seeking to disavow?" We filmed
with this question in the forefront of our thoughts with a view to examine how
the nature of our looking was always already coded as entitled by virtue of our
recognisable status as privileged citizens. Thus the
subject made object of the film is not others who we encounter on our
privileged passage into lands of otherness, but ourselves in relation to the
looking which we have been entitled to do. As the process evolved and the
questions became clearer, so to was there an alteration in the way we deployed
conventions borrowed from the 'Road Movie' tradition. The film concludes with an
awareness of how the public
world lives in us, despite our best intentions to live beyond the
grasp of its constraints. The fantasy of mastery of living beyond this realm
means not being responsible for how we inevitably can't and don't.
Wayne Salazar, co-maker of the
proposed project, Destroying Angel,
has, in past works, explored the tension between history and memory, between
fact and fiction. In "Some Lies", the essay that
follows, he tells faithfully remembered stories from different stages of his
life linking them together through the common themes of lies we live by and the
construction of gendered identity. These stories culminate in a fictionalized
present, (the beer with Leandro) an imagined scene
used as a vehicle to conclude the telling of events remembered.
In Cuba/USA (1991/19
min),
As a visual artist
CURRENT PROJECT
Destroying
Angel
has evolved through an artistic practice which is integrally connected to my
everyday life. The co-director, Wayne Salazar and I met in
Growing
up in
Building
on what we had already created through exchanges over time, beginning with my
desire to learn from Wayne's ability to be fearless about how he felt, and
Wayne's interest in my past work on family and identity, we started shooting a
film together. What you see in the support material are
shots that
I have
attempted to describe the process-driven nature of this project. As such, we
can't predict how the images mentioned above, or any subsequent images will be
used. However, since we are both curious about the inevitable role of
storytelling in representations of both memory and history we have an idea
about how we might formally explore this role. Two sequences from Destroying
Angel will be re-enactments of childhood memories - both stories
pertain to our relationships with our respective fathers and memories of our
respective pasts (see Story Excerpts which follow).
Our intention is to use a voice-over narrator to tell stories we tell ourselves
about the past, rehearsed histories which restrain the excess of emotion
connected with memories of those events, an excess which we are taught to
believe the present is too fragile to handle.
Memory
will be viewed from a variety of perspectives: memory as fiction, as history
made flesh in the present moment through our desire. The challenge will be to
deal with memory via the manner in which it produces emotional responses which
confusingly appear like phantom pain, and which are disproportionately strong
in relationship to the current situation.
Such a phenomenon is connected to an event long forgotten consciously,
but visible in the lingering pains confusingly present in response to events
which remind us of what we are afraid to remember. For example, in the story Rabbit,
I lingered on a recent incident involving the accidental death of a rabbit only
to recall a hunting expedition with my father when I was young where he
unwittingly wounded a rabbit who then suffered a painful death. The tyranny of
memory made it difficult to recall that painful episode and thus to grasp why a
similar incident in the present was so intense without any particular referent.
It was only upon reflection that I was able to recognise
my reaction as a response to an event long ago forgotten. It is our intention
through the process of making this film together, to create an ever-changing satisfying
present through recreation/reintegration of the past. In doing so the revenge
of the repressed will be seen as a liberatory moment
of self discovery made possible through collective reflection, not to be viewed
as pathology nor solely the jurisdiction of the analyst couch, but rather an
activity that belongs firmly in the social world which produces the repression
in the first instance.
The
stories will be told through words and images - words will give content of the
memory, images will show a re-enactment of the stories, though the scenes will
not be scripted. Place and elements of the original story will be brought
together and integrated through the present moment. For example
We
will start with three of the stories enclosed (Story Excerpts - Rabbit,
Dog,
Traveling
Salesman). As the project grows and transforms, we will incorporate
other stories you will read here. In addition stories of the past will surface
and be integrated (through editing) with stories already told. This
transformative process will create one new fluid narrative about relationships:
son to father, father to
son,
friend to friend.
By
relying on this process to date we have been able to put shape to a project
that could not have otherwise been conceived. Hence our faith
that by continuing to trust the process, the film will figuratively make
itself.
LOGISTICS OF COLLABORATION
Filming
Locations:
Mt
The
film & sound post production will be done in
Toronto/Mount
Forest by Philip with collaboration from
Production
Schedule:
August 95 to May 96
on
Super-8, Hi-8 and 16mm, Wayne and Philip will shoot day to day images from
home, pertaining to proposal content
November
95
shooting
plan
and record sound
finish
1st rough cut
March
96
Philip
to
additional shooting
narration recording
hi-8
edit and kine
finish
2nd rough cut
May 96
final
picture and sound edit
sound
mix
June 1996
1st answer print complete
REGARDING THE SUPPORT MATERIAL
In the best of all worlds, I'd
like you to watch any one of my more recently completed films in order to get a
sense of my filmmaking practice, including: how I handle ideas over time;
explore the relationship between sound and image; and push the borders of my
formal practice vis a vis
experimental image making. Fantasies aside, I realise
you are operating on time restraints given the number of applicants and support
material you must view. In this light, I have selected excerpts from several of
my films including passing through / torn formations (1988/43 min)
?O,Zoo! (The Making of a Fiction Film) (1986/23 min) and Sweep
(1995/32 min)and entitled the tape Past
Work Excerpts. These
excerpts will focus your attention on the elements which will be further
pursued in Destroying Angel i.e. storytelling/memories and
collaborative production, and thus hopefully establish the link between past
work and the concerns of this proposal. A second tape is included in the
support material and is entitled Shooting Test - Destroying Angel.
As mentioned, it includes some of the shots Wayne and I took during his recent
visit to
STORY EXCERPTS
Salesman
He
wasn't home much, only on weekends, because he worked as a traveling insurance
salesman. Picture this: a man with a thick Spanish accent, who had immigrated
to the States from Guatemala when he was 32 years old, crisscrossing the
Mid-west in his car, selling life insurance to farmers in Iowa, Illinois, Ohio,
Indiana, Missouri, Wisconsin. And he was good at it.
A
couple of times a year he'd take me along, and I'd help him find the little
towns on the map so we could plan our route. When we got there, I'd play with
the kids and with the animals. I got to see rich and poor and in-between, and
to know another way of life.
Dog
I
remember when I was five years old, I wondered what
people meant when they used the word `love'. I knew it wasn't something I could
point at, like 'ball', and it wasn't a simple action, like 'run'. I thought
about it sometimes.
That
summer my dad took our dog for a walk. This was unusual but it made sense
because Chico was a big dog, and whenever my brother or I took him for a walk
he always ended up pulling us off our feet and running away, to be found hours
later by an irate person who's flower bed had been dug up on the other side of
town. When dad came home he was carrying an empty leash.
"Did
"No," he said and
then he explained that he'd gotten rid of
"But
I loved him!" I blurted out through my tears and suddenly I realized I new
what that word meant.
I
became a cat person like my mother.
Mother
My
mother lives alone, in a house in the woods, with a cat named Kisa. The house is very `gray gardens' at this point:
unpainted outside for ten years, or inside for twenty. The walls and ceilings
are stained from the smoke of cigarettes she chain smokes. Mold grows amongst
the crumbs in the refrigerator. The bushes have grown as high as the house; the
bottoms of them have been eaten away by deer in the night. She's lonely, pining
for love and human contact, but too afraid of being hurt to be able to give in
the give-and-take of an emotional bond.
I
hadn't looked forward to the trip to see her. It had been three and a half
years -- not coincidentally, I believe, the same amount of time I've been
living with HIV. She's in denial; we never talk about it. She never, for
instance, asks me how I feel. I want her to nurture and support me, but since I
was a child it was always I who nurtured her. It was I who stood by her as she
divorced my father, when her father and my brother turned against her. It was I
who helped her through her attempts at suicide.
The
first day of my visit to her house I was angry at her for her silence about my
illness. The second day I kept reminding myself that she had never in my life
been nurturing in the way I was hoping for now. I accepted that, but was still
angry.
The
third day, over a bottle of wine, she matter-of-factly began a conversation
about the way our society keeps people in a state of prolonged
childhood--keeping kids at home too long, and in school even longer--when
biologically we're programmed to leave home much earlier, at the age of 14 or
so. We are meant, she said, to become independent earlier.
How
then, I asked, do you account for the deep connection we continue to want with
our parents, the longing we maintain for our parents' love? Well, she said, it's true,
we all want that unconditional love. (In her case, especially, this is true:
Her parents never made her feel loved. An only child, she was an accident, and
always knew it.)
But I
always felt loved unconditionally, I said. What I didn't feel, and still don't,
is nurtured.
"Oh,
I know," she said, not missing a beat. "I leaned on you for far too
long -- I feel terrible guilty about it. I made you the parent."
I was
stunned. I didn't know she was that aware of it.
"Yes,"
I said, "that's it exactly. So as your child, I'd like it if you could be
more nurturing. And as your parent, I think you need to face my illness now,
rather than later. It will only get harder for you."
"I
try not to think about it," she said, and the waitress brought the check.
A Beginning
Today
Richard said something I want to talk to him more about. I'm not sure I
understand it, or can repeat it here. It has to do with the legacy people with
AIDS leave to generations of survivors. He feels it benefits society, or our
culture, to see PWAs conquer their demons, to find
peace in their lives before they die. A legacy of peace, not
struggle; of contentment, not confusion. More on this later, I guess.
Philip's
story:
Rabbit
The
last time we killed a rabbit was when I was nine. Dad and I went on our winter
weekend cottage trip to the lake, me running home, breathless at lunch hour
Friday. Dad would pull me out of school in the afternoon sometimes so we could
get an early start.
We'd
go for long walks with the gun (that's what men did), under the pretense of
hunting. Mostly we walked quietly, taking in the sights of the freshly fallen
snow.
The
rabbit jumped out, startled us at close range, its big feet sliding across the
thin cover of fresh snow, and dad knee deep, two thick legs, grounded - he
reacts without thought and fires. The rabbit takes the shot, from dad's 12 gauge. I don't remember him ever hitting an animal except
this time he did. The animal winces and scrambles to an alcove for cover. Screaming pain. We walk through some evergreen, and into the
clearing to see the suffering animal - butterflies surface in my stomach; dad
felt bad. The creature just stared up at us.
Twenty
three years later
we're on the road to Holland Centre, in the July sunrise. After a few days of
rest and work at the lake, the cottage now their home, dad is driving me to the
bus for my trip back to my home,
for
the soon to be arriving grandchildren. He liked being with his son, few words,
just the bond of working together, passed down from his dad to him and him to
me. I felt comfortable within this wordless intimacy.
Traveling
on gravel dad turned and pointed at some beautiful wildflowers, purply branches. I ask dad to hurry. "I'll be late.." He steps on it just as a small rabbit arrives in
full view, through the clear sights of the car's windshield. It scampers
hesitantly in front and falls beneath the car's dark, hovering body. Fur flies
up behind us. The double thud tells us that the animal did not find a route
through. I try and break the tension with a remark about having rabbit tonight.
shit - ! Dad is silent.
As we
drive I can tell it hurts him. He recalls for me other times when rabbits and
dogs find their way through. Waiting for death under the car's body - the
silence could last a lifetime. And then magically across the
road - safe.
Dad
places the gun barrel against the rabbit's ear to stop the pain, and fires.
What's inside comes out. The suffering stops. We trudge home through the
snow...silent, defeated.
As I
sit on the bus and replay the scenes to myself, I wonder where all the
butterflies had gone this time...years of silence had closed tight the road
from heart to speech.
I
wonder whether dad went back and dragged the rabbit off the road and put it in
the bushes as a makeshift burial. I imagine he might do that. Maybe I'll call
him tonight, see how he's doing, find out what
happened.